The Enhanced Games aspire to usher in a new era for the Olympic Games and sports in general, where performance enhancers are not only allowed but applauded.
This initiative, spearheaded by influential figures like Dr. Aron D’Souza, Christian Angermayer, and Maximilian Martin, advocates for a shift to a model where athletes are not only thoroughly compensated but also empowered to explore the boundaries of human potential through science, potentially leading to unprecedented athletic achievements.
While the organization insists that athletes’ safety is a priority, the very concept of openly using enhancements will not please many people.
From an outsider’s perspective, especially for those not familiar with the specifics of what the Enhanced Games are promoting, this approach might seem to counteract the fundamental principles of sports, leadership, ethics, and morals.
It’s not hard to figure out that the use of PEDs is highly criticized because of the significant health risks they pose and the ethical concerns they raise about fair play.
Adding more fuel to the fire, Lance Armstrong’s pending attendance at the games adds a layer of complexity, given his previous transgressions. While his participation highlights the organization’s acceptance of enhancements, it also sparks debates about the type of message it sends regarding sports ethics and the portrayal of leadership within the structure of the organization.
The use of enhancers in sports is utterly unacceptable for a multitude of reasons, and there can be no denying this fact. If the games are to proceed, the consequences, the resulting media attention, and the blurred lines between ethical and unethical practices would be dangerously breached.
Leave a Reply